Gun Control Part 2

Why do the "Elitists" among us want to take guns away from everyday Joe & Jane American?  We know it's not to make life "safer" for us; we have proven that's a lie.  No, the political and social elite among us don't really care about our safety.  They only care about themselves.  The politicians will have their armed Secret Service agents and police forces.  And the social elitists, like Rosie O'Donnell who rants about gun control while walking around with an armed body guard, oh yeah, they will be protected.  So why the double standard?  Well it's simple, it's because they are the "important" people.  Don't you understand?  They think of their lives as so much more significant than yours or mine, that they MUST be protected.  But as for you and me, well we being armed is just a danger to them and their ability to keep us in "our place" ... under their thumb.  This is nothing new.  It has been that way since the beginning of time.  The powerful want to keep power and so they reserve the tools of power for themselves.

You see, the "Elitists" will always be among us.  History is full of them and the horrors they have inflicted upon their fellow man.  The British Monarchy and the evils of the "Class System" was something our founding fathers understood all too well.  They understood that you need an armed citizenry (Militia) to keep the "Elitists" (those who would wish to subjugate everyone else) in check.  That's the reason for the Second Amendment to the Constitution:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The Founders new that for us to preserve the "Rights and Freedoms", that they believed were "God given" and that they had codified in the Constitution, we would need the ability to resist those who would wish to place themselves above us and strip us of those rights.  They believed in a small standing army and an armed citizenry to back it up when necessary but also to resist its misuse by a truculent political class.   These men understood the dangers of the "Elitists" having all the power.  Little by little, they would take all our "Rights and Freedoms" for themselves and we would be back to the status of mere serfs, used for their bidding with NO HOPE for us or our children to ever raise our status.

Our "Right" to bear arms must NEVER be surrendered.  It is what gives us the power to defend ourselves and the rest of our God given Rights from tyranny.  

Now I know some of you will say; "Okay, but it the government uses the army against us, we wouldn't stand a chance, so what good would it do, even if every adult man and woman in the country owned a gun, we would still lose."  Okay, let me answer that by quoting Isoroku Yamamoto, Fleet Admiral and Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy during World War II:

"Japan would never invade the United States.  We would find a rifle behind every blade of grass."
You see, Yamamoto knew that the majority of Americans owned guns at that time and they would use them to defend their Homeland.  He knew the fearless tenacity of the American warrior he was facing every day.  He had even remarked how they often "sacrificed themselves like Samurai".  He understood that even an army of 500 thousand, who would be ordered to attack an army of say 80 MILLION armed citizens, would be given great pause.

So, that army our government would try to use against us would also be made up of fellow Americans who would be very reluctant to fire on their fellow citizens.  This is why Fascists and Communists use constabulary police forces loyal only to them to control the citizenry and why they institute "Gun Control" early in their takeover of a country.  Let's let a couple of communists tell us in their own words why this is so important:

"Ideas are far more powerful than guns.  We don't let our people have guns.  Why should we let them have ideas?"
                                             - Joseph Stalin

"One man with a gun can control 100 without one."
                                             - Vladimir Lenin

So, when Barack Obama said; "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set.  We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, that's just as well funded",  a chill ran down my spine.  Oh, you didn't hear him say that?  Here, go listen for yourself: https://youtu.be/L3YG7k25sFM  


Here is what happens when you let the Elitists take the guns away from you:

1911 - Turkey disarmed its citizens, and between 1915  & 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.

1929 - Russia disarmed its citizens, and between 1929 & 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.

1935 - China disarmed its citizens, and between 1948 & 1952 they murdered at least 20 million Chinese.

1938 - Germany disarmed its citizens, and between 1939 & 1945 they murdered 16 million people. 

1956 - Cambodia disarmed its citizens, and between 1975 & 1977 they murdered 1 million people.

1964 - Guatemala disarmed its citizens, and between 1964 & 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.

1970 - Uganda disarmed its citizens, and between 1971 & 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.

The excuse given by the authorities that they need to take guns away from the citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by the facts.  Every time you disarm the citizens you make it too easy for the power-mad to use police forces and military to silence those who oppose their seizure of more and more power.

So, have I got you to think???  Knowing what you know now ... do you think letting the government control all the guns is a good idea?

I am Whamm, may those with wisdom hear the truth and be empowered in their fight to remain free.